Home Story Bad roads, congested commutes cost state drivers $44 billion a year, report says

California drivers pay a staggering $44 billion a year in extra car costs because of traffic jams that seemingly grow worse by the day, spreading potholes and outdated roads and bridges, according to a national highway advocacy group.

 Some Bay Area drivers fork over as much as $2,200 a year, according to a report released Thursday by The Road Information Program, or TRIP.
The latest report isn’t telling regional transportation officials anything they haven’t heard before, but it remains sobering…

Driving on deficient roads costs each San Francisco-Oakland-area driver $2,206 per year in the form of extra vehicle operating costs, according to the report. In the South Bay, it’s $1,723 a year per driver, and Los Angeles drivers have it the roughest, forking out $2,458 a year.

 The TRIP study found that 49 percent of major roads in the San Francisco-Oakland area are in poor condition and an additional 30 percent are mediocre, costing the average motorist an additional $795 each year in extra vehicle operating costs.
 That’s due to accelerated vehicle depreciation, additional repair costs and increased gas use and tire wear, said Carolyn Bonifas Kelly, a TRIP spokeswoman…
Traffic officials spread out across the state Thursday to spread the worrisome news and promote measures to raise funds for more pavement and public transit. Alameda County will seek a sales tax hike in the November election, and Santa Clara County is expected to do so in two years. A statewide measure to raise the vehicle license fee could also be on the 2016 ballot, and numerous cities, including San Francisco, are also considering an appeal to voters… Direct link to PDF of report:…  (more)
MTCfundingchart
According to this chart, the regional transit authority plans to demand more revenues from residents while proving less service. We are working on a list of ballot proposals that voters are facing in November.
So far in SF we have Props A and B that would expand the revenues of the SFMTA and the counter proposal, Prop L to change their priorities.
We favor No on A and B (No more money without accountability.) and Yes on L: Restore Transportation Balance.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s