Objections to the Potrero streetscape rollout took center stage at a neighborhood meeting at Zuckerberg SF General that was called to update concerned neighbors on the various construction projects underway and planned for the hospital grounds. The public has been complaining for months about the new slalom run on Potrero that mimics the curvy streets on Third Street, where traffic is forced on and off the light rail tracks, and distracted drivers have difficulty watching for pedestrians while they attempt to follow the lane changes.
Nobody addressed the new hospital plans. Complaints were about:
- The lack of notice about the meeting
- Distracted driving
- Dangerous new curvy lanes with up to 22 turns and constant changes.
- Medians and trees – design, placement, and choice of trees.
- Increase in traffic on narrow sides-streets where most cyclists choose to ride.
- Confusing signs and directions
- Traffic signal removal
- Some mention was made of the Fire Department’s concerns that are supposed to have the project on hold, but, more details are needed on that subject
There were a lot of suggestions for improvements:
- A better noticing system for neighborhood with a 2-week lead time
- Elimination of the extended medians past the pedestrian walkways that drivers are not anticipating
- Removal of some of the most objectionable medians that restrict traffic flow
- Re-opening the 23rd Street pass through from the Potrero Hill ramp that allows entry into the Mission. It was noted that this is the second barrier to keep people out of the Mission devised by SFMTA.
- Better clearer signage and possibly a freeway sign warning of a construction site ahead for drivers who wander off the freeway
- Elimination of forced right turns and no right turns.
- Moving bike lane to side street and possible speed controls on those streets.
All of the changes and experiments that SFMAT claims will calm traffic are making drivers more angry and less safe and calm. Residents on the narrow side streets are seeing claim the accident count is up more accidents, making everyone less safe, and creating havoc on the street, as drivers attempt to watch the road changes and other cars, they are finding it hard to watch out for pedestrians and the occasional bike at the same time. This AAA study seems to back up the public’s fears about distracted driving, and explains why many of the traffic infractions are attributed to Ubers and Lyfts who don’t know the city and are depending on dashboard maps to get around.
We need to insist that our supervisors look at these studies and accident reports and consider what options they have to reverse the SFMTA project approvals, straighten the streets, and limit out-of-town TNCs that do not know the city. This study should also be sent to the Governor who may have signed SB 182 into law last week. That state bill was passed prior to all these reports as far as we know. If this bill is written into law, the next step is to go to the state level agency and deal with is there. More on that to come.