ENUF joined the non-partisan backlash against government overreach that is fighting privatization and commercialization of public streets and  properties all over the country. We are abandoning former party alliances to protect our civil liberties. We are working to stop the development that is bringing the massive traffic mess to our streets. We are also backing new leadership at City Hall. A new site: enufsf.com  that focuses on the NE parking plans was just launched.

The history of the movement: Eastern Neighborhoods United Front (ENUF) was born out of concerns over plans to install thousands of parking meters in the North Eastern Neighborhoods. When signs popped up announcing that parking meters were going to to installed all over Potrero Hill, Dogpatch and the Mission District, hundreds of angry citizens showed up at City Hall to protest. Residents and merchants complained about meters in front of their homes and businesses with no notice, discussion or input on their part. Neighborhood groups filed an appeal and the next day the SFMTA withdraw their plans.

Citizens organized a public meeting which was widely attended by Supervisors, SFMTA staff the media, and hundreds of irate residents. Things did not go well for the SFMTA at that meeting and they backtracked from their original plans. At this point they had a foe that was ready to strike back.

Stop SFMTA: ENUF started a petition to Stop SFMTA which put more pressure on the city authorities and gave drivers and car owners a means to direct their anger and personal stories to the city authorities.

Uniting the neighborhoods: SFMTA attempted to divide and conquer by going after one street at a time, but ENUF united all neighborhood residents and merchants and together we were able to convince the Supervisors to limit the expansion of the parking meters in the city, using the one means possible of controlling the SFMTA. They amended the parking meter contract to limit the number of meters purchased. Recently SFMTA gave up enforcement of the Sunday parking meters as well.

Restore Transportation Balance: ENUF has been credited with starting the fight but now the anger has boiled over to the point that political forces have gathered to place the Restore Transportation Balance initiative on the November ballot. Passage of this ballot, which only requires a 51% vote to pass, will send a strong message to the SFMTA that their days are numbered if they don’t change course. http://www.restorebalance14.org/

contact@sfenuf.net with your suggestions and concerns
Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/SFENUF
Twitter:  https://twitter.com/#!/sf_enuf

Recent Posts

SFMTA oversight

from SF Chronicle letters, 10/27/16 – excerpt

While walking down to Polk Street yesterday, I stopped to read a flyer taped to a pole and was once again reminded of the absolute power that the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency holds over the city. This flyer urged people to vote for a number of measures that The Chronicle has given a thumbs down to. One is Muni oversight.

After participating in a process of meetings and hearings on the Polk Streetscape Project, I was completely disheartened. The people of the neighborhood were barely heard. I was left with the impression that the SFMTA was going to do whatever it wanted, regardless. Now, they have big plans for Van Ness Avenue.

This elaborate plan is happening without question. Hundreds of trees will be cut down to enable this work. This act is a devastating tragedy in itself. I am afraid to think of how many more parking spaces will be eliminated. But this is part of the SFMTA’s Transit-First policy.

Forcing people out of their cars is a big agenda. The feeling I get is of a powerful city department that can ride roughshod over the people, devastate neighborhoods and the environment, answerable to no one. Scary. SFMTA needs oversight.

– Carol Drobek, San Francisco

Vote Yes on L!

When you compare the SFMTA Board meetings to the SF Planning Commission Meetings, you can see the difference having a more balanced board makes. The SFMAT Board meetings always end the same way. Whatever staff suggests is what the Board votes unanimously to do, regardless of what the public says. All members of the SFMTA Board are appointed by the Mayor. Proposition L would change that and at least 3 members of the Board would be appointed by the Board of Supervisors.

According to the Public Press, if proposition L passes, a new board would take form in June 2017. This is really important because there appears to be a plan to merge Planning and Transportation, meaning all the tricks the SFMTA has been playing with (or I should say on) the public, will be visited on us by the Planning Department soon if we don’t act now to stop it.

This is why huge amounts of money are being spent to stop DHL+M. But, we know better, don’t we? We are smarter than that. We are going to help spread this video:

We are are going to let people know they can vote for change at City Hall and take back our city and our streets! We are going to support Muni riders not contractors. We are going to bring back the service Muni riders want and ditch the techie gizmos SFMTA is buying instead. We are going to overhaul the entire program by putting people into office who will service us not tax and spent on programs we object to.

  1. Castro Merchants Talk Demand-Responsive Parking Meter Pricing, Set To Roll Out Citywide In 2017 Leave a reply
  2. Game-changer bus for San Francisco’s notoriously slow Muni system nears its debut, but not everyone’s on board Leave a reply
  3. Dissenting view: Yes on Prop L 1 Reply
  4. New Marina Parking Restrictions Targeting Car-Dwellers Upset Homeless Activists Leave a reply
  5. New ‘Subway Vision’ maps show tunnels of the future Leave a reply
  6. U.S. DOT Adopts Vision Zero Leave a reply
  7. Prop. L would divide City Hall influence over Muni and streets 1 Reply
  8. Municipal Transportation Agency has Failed San Francisco 1 Reply
  9. D, H, L, and M Props Supporters United 4 Replies