New California EPA Rules: Cities CAN Create Auto Gridlock for Hiking, Bikes, Horses and Government Transportation

By Stephen Frank

The proposed rules of the California Environmental Agency is too CREATE auto gridlock and to make it harder for you to drive your car. Read this section carefully. The bottom line is that instead of adding lanes for cars, they want to TAKE AWAY car lanes, to be replaced with lanes for bikes, walking and government buses. This will crowd the cars into one lane, force longer commute times in an effort to frustrate drivers out of their cars.

“Typical mitigation for automobile delay involves adding roadway capacity by increasing the size or width of intersections – a wholly automobile-focused solution which tended to disincentive increased adoption of alternate modes of transportation. SB 743, and as a result of OPR’s new proposal, seeks to eliminate this disincentive, with the legislative intent of “more appropriately balanc[ing] the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.”…

California Proposes Overhaul of Standards for Transportation-related Environmental Impact Analysis

Kristina Daniel Lawson, Partner, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Earlier this month Governor Jerry Brown’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released for public review and debate a draft of proposed amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act’s implementing guidelines (CEQA Guidelines). If ultimately approved, the guidelines will fundamentally change the way transportation-related environmental impacts are analyzed and mitigated throughout California.

While the proposed amendments are currently in draft form and therefore remain subject to change or even withdrawal, if the proposal advances, automobile delay will generally no longer be considered a significant impact on the environment for CEQA purposes. Once approved, the provisions will take effect immediately in California’s transit priority areas, and then statewide in 2016, unless adopted earlier by a local community.

Today CEQA’s transportation analyses focus on the delay experienced by an individual automobile driver at a study intersection or on a roadway segment. Traffic engineers quantify this delay through a metric known as “level of service” or LOS.

Targeting the LOS standard, last year Senate Bill 743 was approved and signed into law requiring OPR to prepare revisions to the CEQA Guidelines that establishes criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts within transit priority areas. SB 743 followed on the heels of the implementation of SB 375 and AB 32, which together placed a heightened focus on the link between land use and transportation planning decisions and greenhouse gas emissions in California. In addition to the increased need for local governments to focus on greenhouse gas emissions reductions through land use and transportation planning, the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 had required local governments to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel

State legislators: To say that OPR’s proposal is an overhaul is an understatement – if adopted, the draft guideline will fundamentally change how California thinks about transportation and traffic. Because of the sweeping nature of the proposed changes to California’s standards for transportation-related environmental impact analysis, we can expect significant comments to be received by OPR. If you wish to weigh in, do so by October 10, 2014 to: CEQA.Guidelines@ceres.ca.gov…. (more)

Your state legislators are using your tax dollars against you. Find out who “They” are and who is financing this. Let them know how you feel about these plans and how unlikely you are to support them next time they run for office should they vote against your interest. Also note the lack of serious discussion about how these plans will improve public transit. Write your state legislators

Sunday Meter Repeal Needs No CEQA Review, Say SFMTA and Planning Dept.

by : sfstreetsblog -excerpt

An appeal claiming that the repeal of Sunday parking meters is an action that requires environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act is baseless, according to responses issued by the SFMTA and Planning Department this week.

The appeal, filed by Livable City and the SF Transit Riders Union, is set for a hearing and vote at the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday. The board will not vote not on the merits of running parking meters on Sundays. Instead, the board will vote on whether CEQA would require an environmental impact report for the SFMTA’s new budget, which directs the agency to stop charging for meters on Sundays. The supervisors’ decision is expected to be largely informed by the recommendations of the SFMTA and the Planning Department… (more)

 

Supervisors to vote on environmental appeal of commuter shuttle program

by sfexaminer – excerpt

Opponents to The City’s shuttle fee program say the commuter buses, which handle about 35,000 boardings on an average weekday, hurt the environment and drive up housing costs.

Dueling interests battling over the future of San Francisco will face off at City Hall on Tuesday when the Board of Supervisors will vote on an appeal of a commuter shuttle pilot program.

While the decision will be based on a California environmental law, the vote on the fee program has broader significance and political ramifications in the ongoing debate over whether the booming technology industry is hurting San Francisco’s character or is a welcomed economic engine deserving praise. Under the fee pilot, commuter buses using Muni stops would pay $1 per stop per day.

Judging by the arguments laid out in the appeal case and the efforts of both sides to turn out their supporters, the tensions that have been building up in The City over evictions and a climbing cost of living — which have already led to spirited community meetings, rallies and legislative efforts — will come to a head.

Tuesday’s vote was triggered when the largest city employee union, Service Employees International Union Local 1021, with the support of other groups like the League of Pissed-Off Voters, filed an appeal under the California Environmental Quality Act over the commuter shuttle program, which was approved in January by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. Under the state law, projects are analyzed for their impacts on the environment. Those with no significant impact can be exempted from doing an environmental study, which was the case with the shuttle pilot program… (more)

Continue reading