L train changes anger Sunset residents

goldengatexpress – excerpt

L Taravel riders opposing the SFMTA plans have turned in petitions with 1000 signatures to keep all the L Taraval stops. Merchants have turned in nearly as many signatures on their petition opposing all of SFMTA’s proposals on the Taraval corridor.  Let me know if you ride the L taraval; if so, you can sign the petition.  Contact the riders at : saveourLtaravalstops@gmail.com

Residents and shop owners alike in the Sunset District’s Taraval Street have collected signatures opposing the proposed changes to the train stops in the area.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency is proposing a number of changes for the L Taraval designed to improve safety in the area.

Taraval Street is one of the streets in San Francisco where the most accidents occur, according to Paul Rose, SFMTA’s Media Relations Manager. Rose stated that there have been 46 traffic accidents – involving pedestrians, vehicles, and/or bikers – on Taraval Street in the past 5 years, and that 22 of those collisions have involved riders who were hit getting off the L train.

In an attempt to combat these accidents, SFMTA wants to implement several changes under the L Taraval Rapid Project. The proposed changes include adding lanes that exclusively for Muni vehicles, extending the length of existing train boarding islands, and eliminating six L Taraval stops between the San Francisco Zoo and West Portal in order to decrease train travel time between the two areas.

SFMTA proposes removing both stops at Taraval Street and 17th Avenue, the outbound stop at Taraval Street and 22nd Avenue, the inbound stop at Taraval Street and 24th Avenue, both stops at 28th Avenue, the outbound stop at Taraval Street and 25th Avenue and both stops at Ulloa Street and 15th Avenue.

“The L Taraval project is a safety project to improve muni rider safety and pedestrian safety,” Rose said. “Stop consolidation is meant so Muni can travel the same distance in less time with a shorter wait for the train.”

Many of the students who live in the area are either a proponent of the changes or don’t think taking stops out would affect their lives.

Brian Lacalle, SF State Fine Arts alumni, said he would be in favor of taking out some of the stops.

“I live all the way at the end of the L by the beach, so I have no problem cutting my stops through Sunset Boulevard in half,” Lacalle said. “(Right now the train) stops at every other block, which is half of the ride to get to the main stations.”

SF State marketing major Zac King also said that he didn’t think taking stops out would affect his daily commute.

“I live pretty close to a couple of different stops, so the worst case scenario would only make you walk like a block further, which is not a big deal.”

However, some of the residents who have lived on Taraval longer are concerned with what the stop removal would mean for their commute.

Paula Katz, a longtime Sunset resident who has been active in collecting resident signatures against the proposed changes, has a different concern about removing the train stops.

“(Removing the stops) would be saving two or three minutes (of transit time), but (many) people living here think is horrible because they’re going to have to walk 4 or 5 extra minutes so it doesn’t save them time at all,” Katz said.

Katz expressed concern for senior citizens who would have to walk farther to catch their train.

“There are people who will have difficulty walking the extra distance, especially uphill, and might risk missing the L. It can be a real hardship for many seniors and people with disabilities,” Katz said. “(Some residents have) lived down here for more than a generation. They’ve grown up relying on their stops.”

The L carries approximately 29,000 commuters a day, and 1,000 of its passengers get on the train in the Sunset district, according to the SFMTA website.

Katz and the other members of the community working to keep the current L stops have collected 1,000 signatures on 300 petitions, according to Katz.

“People in our neighborhood don’t think we need all these changes,” Katz said… (more)

So far none of the recent changes instituted by SFMTA on the streets have made anyone happy. They have succeeded in upsetting pretty much everyone in all the neighborhoods. Time to revisit the policy priorities of SFMTA and their illustrious board.

The Mission is once again ground zero. All the anger of the Mission residents will multiply and spill out over the rest of the city. Time to Take back City Hall to force the SFMTA Board members to stop messing with our streets.

Commute to campus comes at a higher cost for students after Muni and parking price increases

By Daniel Rivera : goldengatexpress – excerpt

The commute to SF State became more expensive today, with the price for a single ride on Muni increasing to $2.25. The surge in cost follows the introduction of a $1 increase on daily parking passes on campus July 1.

“I don’t like it,” said SF State student Coel James, who rides public transportation three times a week. “If I’m paying more, there should be more buses.”

San Francisco Municipal Transit Authority (SFMTA) boosted the price of monthly passes, including the Adult “A” Fast Pass, from $76 to $80, and the “M” Fast Pass, from $66 to $68, to match the single ride increase. The fare for a Lifeline monthly pass, a discounted pass for limited-income residents, rose from $33 to $34 as well…

Along with the Muni fee hikes came a rise in the SF State daily parking permit fee from $6 to $7, which took effect over summer and was the first increase of its kind in two years… (more)

OPINION: Daily commuters should get discounted campus parking permits

By Madison Rutherford : goldengatexpress – excerpt

It’s hard enough to roll out of bed to make an 8 a.m. class. For the 88 percent of SF State students who live off campus, the struggle is even more real. Many students must rely on the questionably steadfast steeds known as Muni and BART. For some, it’s a traffic-ridden car commute across the bridge. But this semester, being a student at a “commuter school” is about to get a lot more difficult.

Drivers will also be impacted because daily on-campus parking rates have increased from $6 to $7. In 2010, it only cost $5 a day to park at school.

The impending hike in parking rates and Muni fares will make it even more difficult than before to get to and from SF State. Among ever-increasing rent, tuition, health fees and overpriced books the least of a student’s worries should be affording their morning commute…

SF State faculty are given heavily discounted parking passes. Why aren’t students given the same liberties?

Daily commuters should get discounted parking permits like faculty do. We work just as hard to be here. We should be commended, not punished. If SF State is a commuter school, why doesn’t it cater to commuters?… (more)

SFMTA may install parking meters at SF State to encourage greater Muni ridership

by Alex Emslie : Golden Gate Xpress – excerpt

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency could use streets around SF State as a future site for additional parking meters, but it’s unlikely drivers will be willing to pay for what are now free parking spaces anytime soon.
“We have no concrete plans to install the meters at SF State, but are certainly vetting the concept with various stakeholders and soliciting input,” said SFMTA spokesman Paul Rose in an email. The SFMTA did not respond to requests for the review, and did not clarify how the agency is considering the concept with stakeholders…
SF State business administration major Jimmy Kim, 23, said he doesn’t like the way the SFMTA targets drivers and doesn’t believe the agency’s services justify increasing fares for public transit users like himself, and increased parking fees and tickets for drivers. Kim said he spends about $60 per month riding the Muni M line to SF State.
“I disagree with almost everything the SFMTA is doing,” Kim said…